Two Dimensions of Procurement, One Shared Goal

Procurement is a core function in any company and spans both operational and strategic responsibilities. While operational procurement handles the day-to-day, strategic procurement aims to ensure long-term supply security, cost optimization, and strong supplier relationships.

In many organizations, the lines between the two blur. Operational tasks eat into the capacity of strategic buyers, and clear processes to delineate responsibilities are missing. The result: inefficient workflows, high process costs, and missed opportunities to create value.

This article explains the differences between operational and strategic procurement, examines common challenges, and shows how companies can organize procurement more efficiently.

Definitions: What separates operational from strategic procurement?

Operational procurement

Operational procurement focuses on day-to-day execution. It ensures the company is supplied on time and at the required quality with materials, services, and goods.

Typical tasks:

• Demand identification and validation
• Requesting quotes and comparing prices
• Placing and tracking orders
• Goods receipt control
• Invoice verification and payment release
• Handling complaints and returns

Strategic procurement

Strategic procurement, by contrast, sets the long-term direction of sourcing. Working closely with other functions, it shapes the procurement strategy with an eye to cost, risk, sustainability, and innovation.

Typical tasks:

• Developing sourcing strategies and framework agreements
• Supplier evaluation and development
• Building sustainable supply chains
• Analyzing supply markets and trends
• Defining and monitoring KPIs
• Risk and compliance management

Challenges: When operational work blocks strategic procurement

In practice, strategic buyers often spend a large share of their time on operational tasks. Common causes include:

• High volume of one-off needs. Many small, indirect purchases still require approvals and processing.
• Complex supplier landscapes. Hundreds or thousands of vendors tie up resources for master-data maintenance and invoice handling.
• Manual processes. Breaks between systems and reliance on spreadsheets prolong cycle times.
• Lack of standardization. Different processes across departments hinder central governance.

These factors prevent strategic procurement from focusing on value-adding work such as negotiations, market analysis, or innovation projects.

Boosting efficiency through clear separation and process optimization

Two measures are key to a more efficient procurement organization:

1) Clear roles and responsibilities

A clean split between operational and strategic tasks creates transparency and enables targeted use of resources.

• Operational procurement: focused on order processing, goods receipt, and payment processes.
• Strategic procurement: focused on analysis, planning, and supplier development.

2) Introduce centralized procurement models

A centralized single-vendor (1-vendor) model can streamline operational processes significantly. All one-off purchases and C-parts are routed through an external service provider that is maintained as the only vendor of record in the system.

Benefits:

• Fewer vendors to manage
• Less effort for master-data maintenance and invoice handling
• Capacity freed up for strategic procurement
• Standardized, end-to-end processes without system breaks
• Faster cycle times and lower process costs

Conclusion: Operational and strategic procurement in balance

A high-performing procurement function requires clear task separation and efficient processes. Only when strategic procurement is relieved of operational workload can it fully play its role as a driver of value.

Central solutions such as the single-vendor (1-vendor) model offer a pragmatic path to automate operational workflows and refocus on strategic goals—creating a procurement organization that is both efficient in day-to-day operations and positioned for the future.

‍