When indirect procurement is almost as expensive as the goods themselves

October 29, 2025

Why process costs for unstructured requirements are barely in relation to the value of the goods

TL;DR
  • At Witzenmann GmbH, process costs per order were as high as €140 – with an average goods value of only €260
  • €42,000 in annual process costs for 300 one-off requirements show: the real cost trap is not the price of the goods but the effort behind them
  • Pedlar's single creditor model reduced process costs at Witzenmann by 85% and created capacity for strategic purchasing
read this if

When it comes to purchasing, you quickly think of major negotiations, price optimizations and strategic partnerships with key suppliers. But it is often not the value of the goods that weighs on the budget, but the effort behind it. That was exactly what Witzenmann GmbH made clear. An average one-time requirement cost 260 euros, but the process costs were up to 140 euros per order. With over 300 one-time requirements per year, this resulted in additional process costs of 42,000 euros, which do not even begin to contribute to the profitability of the company.

And that was the real lever. Not in terms of the price of the products themselves, but in the invisible costs of the processes. Every manual supplier research, every approval loop, every check of an individual invoice added up to a cost block that significantly affected profitability.

Single creditor model

This is exactly where Pedlar comes in. With the single creditor model, Pedlar handles the entire processing of these one-time requirements. Witzenmann adds Pedlar once as a supplier in the system. From then on, every spontaneous order is processed centrally via this one creditor. Pedlar processes the order, ensures a comprehensible, process-compliant process, checks the order confirmation, tracks shipments and clarifies discrepancies. Pedlar also takes care of logistics and invoicing. Everything that previously had to be laboriously and manually done by the purchasing department is no longer necessary.

The result is impressive relief. Witzenmann was able to reduce process costs by 85 percent. In concrete terms, this means savings of 35,700 euros per year. But it is even more important that buyers no longer lose their time in administrative routines, but can invest in value-adding topics, from category strategy to supplier development.

Our case study shows that the biggest savings potential in purchasing does not always lie in negotiations or price reductions. It is much more often the invisible processes that tie up capacities and weigh on budgets unnoticed.


Purchasing has long meant more than just comparing prices. Anyone who keeps an eye on process costs and consistently optimizes them discovers potential savings that are often far greater than the actual value of goods.

Worth reading

Resources
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date on news and trends in indirect procurement and receive practical insights directly in your inbox every month.
This link will take you to LinkedIn, where you can subscribe to our German-language newsletter.
Pedlar-Logo mit Überschrift: Wie Witzenmann ihr Tailspend-Management vereinfachte, mit einem abstrakten, geschwungenen 3D-Design darunter.
Case Study
Reducing complexity in indirect procurement
Pedlar Logo