1-creditor model vs. classic catalog and procurement solutions - when which model makes sense

January 27, 2026

Efficiency, flexibility and time savings for purchasing through a hybrid procurement strategy

In most companies today, the need for efficiency and control in purchasing dominates. Various digital procurement solutions are available, such as classically structured catalog solutions, comprehensive procurement platforms or specialized solutions for individual and indirect needs. But not every model fits every procurement situation. It depends on the right solution to choose the right type of need and, if in doubt, to combine several models.

Catalogue solutions for standardized requirements

Catalogue solutions are particularly suitable for recurring and standardized needs such as office supplies, consumables or standard parts. Companies can store approved products in it, which buyers or specialist departments can access directly. Prices and conditions are set in advance and orders can be triggered centrally and automatically. This saves time and reduces process costs. Catalogs offer stability and compliance, as all products are tested and suppliers are controlled. They are ideal for needs that occur regularly and can be planned.

One disadvantage of catalog solutions, however, is that they are inflexible when it comes to one-time or special needs. New products or rarely needed items are often not listed. Maintaining master data and managing suppliers also requires additional effort. Catalogs therefore quickly reach their limits for complex or irregular orders.

Classic procurement platforms

Digital procurement systems are designed to digitize procurement and supplier management across the entire process. They enable tenders, supplier evaluation, contract management and evaluation of expenditure centrally and transparently. These systems are particularly suitable for companies that have many structured requirements, use fixed suppliers and process a large volume of orders.

For predictable standard orders, these platforms offer transparency, stability and compliance. However, rare one-off requirements can also be complex here, as new suppliers must be integrated and individual items must be maintained. The costs for such special cases can be high and therefore block purchasing capacities.

Pedlar's 1 creditor model for one-time and indirect needs

Pedlar addresses exactly those cases, which are difficult to reproduce in classic systems. One-off requirements are bundled via Pedlar. The company only needs one vendor in the system, regardless of which supplier the goods or services come from. Ordering, delivery, invoicing and processing are carried out entirely by Pedlar.

The 1-creditor model reduces the effort required for supplier creation, administration of numerous creditors, manual orders and individual invoicing processes. The purchasing process is simplified and resources are freed up that were previously tied up for micro-orders and one-off orders. Purchasing can strategically use these capacities for supplier development, product group management, contract negotiations, risk management and sustainable procurement.

Pedlar does not replace existing systems but complements them where traditional procurement processes reach their limits. Catalogs or procurement platforms remain optimal for predictable standard requirements. Pedlar offers an efficient solution for irregular, unpredictable and unspecific individual requirements.

Why a hybrid strategy makes sense

No single model optimally covers all requirements. A hybrid procurement strategy combines the strengths of the different models and minimizes their weaknesses. Standardised requirements run via catalogues or procurement platforms, indirect demands via Pedlar. This keeps processes structured, data maintained and compliance ensured. At the same time, operational costs are prevented from exploding due to special cases. Purchasing gains flexibility, efficiency and scalability.

Lesenswert

Ressourcen
Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter
Bleiben Sie informiert über Nachrichten und Trends im indirekten Einkauf und erhalten Sie jeden Monat praxisnahe Einblicke direkt in Ihr Postfach
Über diesen Link werden Sie zu LinkedIn weitergeleitet, wo Sie sich für unseren Newsletter registrieren können
Pedlar-Logo mit Überschrift: Wie Witzenmann ihr Tailspend-Management vereinfachte, mit einem abstrakten, geschwungenen 3D-Design darunter.
Case Study
Komplexität in der indirekten Beschaffung reduzieren